CLARIXO Documentation

Documentation across the LLM-side, the User-side, and the Development Platform.

CLARIXO documentation is organized around three first-entry sides. Use LLM-side documentation for Core Runtime control and governed execution, User-side documentation for evidence export and later formal review, and Development Platform documentation for local integration, dry-run structure, and implementation-side guidance.

Local Integration Entry

Start with the fastest local path before you go deeper into the full docs stack

If your team wants to verify the Native API from its own local environment first, start here. This path shows how to run a small local bridge, send a real request, write the returned JSON into a local file, and inspect the result in a local browser preview.

This first local test is designed to prove that your local bridge is working, the API is reachable, and the returned result can be viewed inside your own environment before any broader rollout work begins.

Create local_bridge.py and preview.html in one local folder.
Run python local_bridge.py to create last_response.json from a real API request.
Run python -m http.server 8000 and open http://127.0.0.1:8000/preview.html.
{ "task": "Generate a local implementation suggestion", "target_file": "app/example.py", "goal": "Show a real API response in local preview", "source_code": "print('hello world')" }

What success looks like

The first correct result should show a real accepted response, a local last_response.json, and a structured dry-run package visible in the local browser preview.

Most common first error

If the API returns missing_source_code, add source_code to the payload and run the local bridge again.

What this first stage means

The first successful local request proves local connectivity and structured package return. It does not yet mean that live local file apply behavior is active.

Operating Model

CLARIXO is a runtime control and visibility layer, not a raw passthrough model endpoint

Applications send user intent and approved context into CLARIXO. CLARIXO then owns routing, guard decisions, execution strategy, fallback handling, runtime memory, and structured explainable execution. The goal is runtime control, visibility, and stable behavior rather than direct dependence on a single model vendor.

Routing

Runtime chooses the execution path

Intent resolution, execution mode, and fallback transitions stay inside the runtime layer.

Guard

Boundary and policy stay attributable

Guard outcomes, escalation conditions, and runtime control constraints remain explicit and reviewable.

Explainability

Decisions remain auditable

Execution path, provider behavior, degraded states, and observability fields can be surfaced without turning the host into the runtime owner.

Three-Side Documentation Split

CLARIXO documentation now starts from three first-entry sides

Use the documentation stack according to the side your team is entering first. LLM-side documentation covers Core Runtime control, routing, fallback, guard behavior, and later governed execution. User-side documentation covers evidence export first, then later grouped review and formal handoff. Development Platform documentation covers local integration, dry-run response reading, field requirements, and implementation-side workflow.

LLM-side

Core Runtime and governed execution path

Start here when your team is evaluating CLARIXO as the runtime layer between applications and external AI providers. Use Integration Preview, Core Runtime API, Integration Manual, and later capability guidance to establish the execution boundary and rollout path.

Open LLM-side Start
User-side

Evidence export first, formal review later

Start here when your team needs user-facing behavior export without moving runtime control first. Use Evidence API Start and Evidence API first. Move into Audit Workspace later when the next need becomes grouped review, reviewer context, and formal handoff.

Open User-side Start
Development Platform

Local integration and implementation-side path

Start here when your team needs local bridge testing, dry-run response reading, field-level requirements, and implementation-side guidance for the OC Platform Native API local path.

Open Development Platform Start
Capability Ladder

Use the documentation stack according to the capability path you are entering next

CLARIXO documentation does not only separate manuals by function. It also maps to the product path and capability your team is entering next: start with Core Runtime API when runtime control comes first, move into Evidence API when evidence export is the immediate requirement, move into Audit Workspace when grouped review, reviewer context, and case export become necessary, and treat deeper governance layers such as AgentOps, Approval Gateway, and organization-wide control as later capability steps inside Core Runtime API. This capability ladder applies to Core Runtime API, while Evidence API and Audit Workspace remain separate documentation paths for evidence export and grouped review.

Builder / Pro

Runtime control and visibility foundation

Use Docs, API, Integration Manual, and Integration Preview to establish the runtime boundary, verify the execution chain, and confirm that routing, fallback, guard behavior, runtime memory, and explainable execution are visible before broader rollout.

Business

AgentOps reading and operator review layer

Move into Observation, queue-detail, runtime-detail, and AgentOps-style reading surfaces when live operator review, queue interpretation, and decision-path reading become operational requirements.

Control

Approval Gateway and execution governance layer

Move into Approval Gateway and execution governance guidance only when approve, block, escalate, or governed execution behavior becomes part of the real production control path.

Enterprise

Organization-wide governance and deployment design

Treat Enterprise as the organization layer: policy layering, ownership design, audit depth, rollout structure, and multi-team deployment control beyond the first integration and first review loop.

Local Integration Guide

Run a small local bridge, write the returned JSON locally, and inspect the result in your own browser

This is the shortest first working path for teams that want to verify the Native API from their own local environment before going deeper into the broader documentation stack.

Step 1
Create one local folder and add local_bridge.py and preview.html.
Step 2
Run python local_bridge.py to call the real Native API and create a local last_response.json.
Step 3
Run python -m http.server 8000 and open http://127.0.0.1:8000/preview.html to inspect the returned JSON in your own browser.
Expected first result
The first correct result should be a visible structured dry-run response. It proves local connectivity and response packaging, not yet live local file apply behavior.
Field Requirements and Error Guide

Send the minimum required fields first, then read the first-stage errors directly from the local response file

The minimum first working request should include the target file path and the current source code. When the request fails, inspect last_response.json first and fix the missing field before retrying.

{
  "task": "Generate a local implementation suggestion",
  "target_file": "app/example.py",
  "goal": "Show a real API response in local preview",
  "source_code": "print('hello world')"
}
Minimum required fields
target_file and source_code should be present in the first working local request.
Most common first error
If the API returns missing_source_code, add source_code to the payload and run the local bridge again.
When the page still shows old data
The latest request usually failed before last_response.json was replaced. Rerun the local bridge, inspect the file directly, and refresh the browser with Ctrl + F5.
Normative Language

Contract rules are interpreted as normative requirements

The CLARIXO contract reference uses uppercase requirement words to separate mandatory compatibility rules from strong recommendations and optional extensions.

MUST / REQUIRED
Mandatory for compatibility, safety, explainability, or observability. If a host breaks a MUST requirement, the integration is non-compliant.
MUST NOT
Prohibited because it would break the contract boundary, hide degradation, or shift internal runtime control into the host system.
SHOULD / RECOMMENDED
Strongly advised for production-grade integrations. A host may omit a SHOULD item only when it understands and accepts the compatibility or observability tradeoff.
MAY / OPTIONAL
Allowed extension points that do not break the controlled runtime contract when implemented correctly.
What This Documentation Covers

Use the manuals for workflow, the references for exact fields, and the support pages for implementation examples

Docs

Reading path for runtime control and visibility work

Use this page to understand how CLARIXO documentation is organized and which manual to read next.

Integration Manual

Correct setup, verification flow, and first-pass readiness

Use the integration manual for boundary setup, implementation order, evidence-first verification, common integration mistakes, and the practical rollout path that turns a basic integration into a production-grade runtime control and visibility layer.

Calibration Manual

Turn a working chain into a trustworthy production baseline

Use the calibration manual to align scene semantics, operator review logic, degraded interpretation, and readiness before scale-up.

Observation Manual

Learn how to read overview, queue-detail, breakdown, and runtime-detail signals

Use the observation manual to interpret health, fallback, low-confidence, review, provider, breakdown, and queue-detail signals correctly.

Troubleshooting Manual

Start from symptoms and trace back to the right layer

Use the troubleshooting manual when telemetry is blank, attribution is wrong, degraded output is flattened, or runtime signals do not match reality.

Optimization Assistant Manual

Use optimization guidance safely and correctly

Use the Optimization Assistant manual to understand diagnosis, recommendation packets, preview selection, and safe apply boundaries.

Contract Reference

Exact request / response / context field semantics

Use the contract reference for stable field names, required meanings, and normalized contract expectations.

Integration Skeletons

Copy-paste-ready implementation patterns

Use the integration skeletons for minimal working request, response, degraded, observability, and structured failure examples.

Manual System

The CLARIXO manual stack now separates setup, calibration, observation, troubleshooting, and optimization usage

Integration Manual
Define host roles, set up the boundary, preserve metadata, verify the full execution chain, and establish the runtime control and visibility surface before treating the integration as real.
Calibration Manual
Stabilize meaning after the chain works: scene semantics, review thresholds, degraded interpretation, and readiness before broader rollout.
Observation Manual
Teach operators how to read overview pages, queue-detail pages, breakdowns, provider attribution, and runtime-detail pages without misreading healthy vs degraded behavior.
Troubleshooting Manual
Start from the symptom layer, then trace to role ownership, metadata continuity, response shape, aggregation, runtime telemetry, or rendering logic.
Optimization Assistant Manual
Explain diagnosis packets, recommendation surfaces, preview selection flow, and the boundary between safe preview and future apply stages.
Recommended next step
Start with the Product page when you need the overall product structure first.

Use Core Runtime API when your team is entering runtime control first. Use Evidence API when your team needs evidence export without moving runtime control first. Use Audit Workspace when your team needs grouped review, reviewer context, and case export built on evidence records.

For Core Runtime API technical setup, follow Integration ManualCalibration ManualObservation Manual. Use Integration Preview to create or inspect a live project and review how runtime behavior appears before broader rollout.

Inside Core Runtime API, Builder and Pro stay focused on runtime control and visibility, Business adds AgentOps reading and review workflows, Control adds Approval Gateway and execution governance, Responsibility extends into Audit Workspace, and Enterprise extends into organization-wide governance, policy layering, and deployment design.

High-impact capability: Approval Gateway and execution governance can affect live output behavior. See Integration Manual for Operator State Execution Governance and rollout guidance.

Keep Troubleshooting Manual and Optimization Assistant Manual for later-stage operations. Supporting references include Contract Reference and Integration Skeletons.
Recommended reading flow:
  1. Docs
  2. Integration Manual
  3. Integration Preview
  4. Calibration Manual
  5. Observation Manual
  6. Troubleshooting Manual
  7. Optimization Assistant Manual

  Capability ladder:
8. Builder / Pro = runtime control and visibility foundation
  
Recommended reading flow:
    1. Docs
    2. Integration Manual
    3. Integration Preview
    4. Calibration Manual
    5. Observation Manual
    6. Troubleshooting Manual
    7. Optimization Assistant Manual

    Capability ladder:
  8. Builder / Pro = runtime control and visibility foundation
  9. Business = AgentOps reading and operator review
  10. Control = Approval Gateway and execution governance
  11. Responsibility = Audit Workspace and responsibility-sensitive review
  12. Enterprise = organization-wide governance and deployment design

    Public readiness set before broader launch:
      12. Live project state visible
      13. Minimum request path verified
      14. Core runtime signals readable
      15. Pricing continuation path confirmed
      16. Support boundary understood

  Supporting documents used across the full manual stack:
    17. Contract Reference
    18. Integration Skeletons
    19. Compatibility Policy
    20. Host implementation
    21. Pre-launch verify

  Executive summary:
    22. Capability Overview + Industrialization Assessment